Nothing is easier than taking for granted what we are used to, and imagining that it is more or less natural so that it requires no
explanation.
The soup of the day is radical change. Everyone wants some form of revolution without proper consideration of what the effects of these changes might be on the privileges we already enjoy.
This is especially true of the environmental revolutionists who are ready to burn everyone on the planet just to protect the planet.
How much suffering should humans who are alive today have to endure to protect humans that might be born in the next century? How many people are you going to sink into poverty (especially in the already poor Third world countries) just to align the world to the vision of the anointed?
Seeing that most people do not think Andrew Tate should be taken off social media, I'd like to know exactly where y'all draw the line on free speech. Or there should be no line?
Andrew Tate has been removed from multiple social media platforms for "spreading hate"
this situation is one of those in which the line between free speech and speech that incites violence, hate, and maltreatment of certain groups is blurred what do you think?
The Economics and politics of Race, an international perspective (Thomas Sowell)
World on fire - Amy chua
Human accomplishments, the pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences 800bc - 1950 by Charles Murray
The bell-curve by Charles Murray and Richard J. Herrnstein
Depending on the time available to be set aside for reading I might also add
Late talking children - Thomas Sowell
The mystery of capital, why capitalism Triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else
